@Bab0osh
Is it really fascinating that after you dismiss everything everyone is saying with half baked answers, and portrays yourself as a pro player to verify your claims, people want to answer you back? Just because you said you'd run away from the discussion you think people will just go on with your nonsense quietly? It's not just a matter of the possibility of you changing your mind, but especially for the bypassers that see this discussion and should have a proper ending to it, unlike you gave them.
And so you admit you're wrong and that you went off-topic. Well, the part you went off-topic is pretty straightforward, no need to admit that. You and @VetteC5RX have loads of exchanged messages about things not covered on this report. There's even a whole page of just you 2 discussing many things totally unrelated to the subject of this report. But in confirming you said many false things, then I encourage you to leave this place and never return, because AHQ doesn't need people that deliver LOADS of lies with cohesion and property. If you want to be a troll, troll lightly, don't make well worked and detailed answers to fool people who don't know better.
But we all know you're lying now, at least from your PoV. You do believe in what you said. It's just a simple strategy in the discussion, admitting the premises but refuting the conclusion, with an ironic touch of incompetence on your part to give it some charm. I'm familiar with these Deception Arts, so please don't try it. Just like you tried the Argument of Authority, and just embarrassed yourself while doing it.
@Bab0osh wrote:
It’s almost fascinating to see myself mentioned by I do not know how many people here only after saying that I will not come and post anything again. So hello again everybody.
Almost equally fascinating, @RogueZeroRendar says I say wrong things and get away from the subject. Let's try something: I admit that everything I said is wrong and that I was completely off topic.
And now what’s left? Who’s getting away from the subject?
This bug report ticket no longer has any reason to be because, if the author who says it himself is believed, it only deals with a problem which has been solved but which could still be improved for him. Apparently, still according to him, there are 2 ways to achieve the same result as before, the old way being simply simpler to do with a chain of action system which is no longer there. 3 unskilled ways to perform an action, but we could say the 2 new ones involve more risks (as there is no risk with the older one which was automatically chaining the dodge and the attack) and could be designated as “more skilled” than the older method if this wasn’t off topic.
The game works, but it does not work as some would like. This topic has become a chimerical weeping office, where everyone only complains of purely subjective things linked each time: either to a poor understanding of what it is interesting “to do or not to do” to win in a lightsaber combat with the current game state, or to simple preferences as if this game was a particular service dispensed for each player.
And please, make yourself intelligible: How talking about the Dodge Attack mechanic is Off-Topic? You say your things like you're about to leave, and then you come back to the discussion? What's wrong with you? And you're answering me there, I'm the OP, I'm the author, why talking about me in third person if I'm the one you're responding to? And you say if I'm to be believed? Why don't you go test the game yourself then? You just admitted you haven't done anything, yet in previous messages you stated things with certainty as if you had tested them yourself, again another deception on your part.
About the 2 ways to achieve the same result, they don't pose any risks, I tried them relentlessly and they pose no risk at all. At least no risk of failing the Dodge Attack that is, before you twist my words when you eventually come back again. The risk only exists if you try to time the attack and press its button once. If you spam, or hold the button, it's 100% success rate.
And no, you're diminishing the issue here by labeling it as personal preferences. Having to let go of the directional buttons is in no way a proper fix to the issue. This is a weird issue, and especially for Console Players it's a nuisance. If you don't let go of the directionals, you'll perform a basic attack, not a Dodge Attack. It's bad, it's a nuisance, it's not like it was before. So it's NOT a proper fix. It's very simple, you don't understand because you don't want to.
And to finish this:
@RogueZeroRendar wrote:
Ok, I just tested after the update.
The Dodge Attacks are back, however in a much different state then they were before. Now you must let go of any directions while already dodging for the following dodge attack to work. And you can't queue the attack before the dodge is over by pressing its button, this will result in nothing done. So you either get the proper timing, or else either spam or hold the attack button to not lose the timing.
I welcome this change, but until further notice I don't think this should be labeled fixed.
Where in this post have I stated it's FIXED? Stop putting words on my mouth! In no way I said it's fixed. The attack animations are back, the ability to dodge and attack the exposed back is now quicker (not sure if equal to how it was before the BUG, but if not it's really close), but that's it. Now you have a harder way to perform them as the queue function is gone (but not gone from Dodge-meleeing or Dodge and using abilities afterwards, or queues elsewhere like queuing an Air Slash while jumping, queuing a Lunge Attack while still in air, or queuing multiple attacks if spamming the attack button and only that), and most importantly, there is this extreme nuisance that forces people to let go of the directionals to perform the Dodge Attack, which doesn't enhance anything in any way, it's extremely hard for Console players due to the use of a Stick instead of buttons, and wasn't how it was before.
If the feature hasn't come back to how it was, then it's not a fix. And if I didn't say it was fixed, then I didn't say it was fixed.
