Interference calls are horrible

by DJDude123
Reply

Original Post

Re: Interference calls are horrible

★★ Apprentice

I've noticed that reverse hits are now being called as penalties. As the player loses the puck in order to brace for the hit, the game now counts that as interference. I really enjoy using back at ya in WOC all the time to counter truculence players.

 

I have a clip on this link.

 

https://www.reddit.com/user/djcrazy20/comments/t33d8f/reverse_hit_interference_penalty/

 

 

Message 51 of 69 (644 Views)

Re: Interference calls are horrible

[ Edited ]
★★ Pro

Interference calls truly are horrible ...and no I didn't try to tie him up or pin him which actually still wouldn't be interference in that situation 

 

https://www.xbox.com/play/media/NN3FKFKR

Message 52 of 69 (579 Views)

Re: Interference calls are horrible


@Treatmentworke66 wrote:

Interference calls truly are horrible ...and no I didn't try to tie him up or pin him which actually still wouldn't be interference in that situation 

 

https://www.xbox.com/play/media/NN3FKFKR


I think the real eye-opening part of this clip is the game engine ignoring a blatant interference call:

 

 

McDavid never comes in contact with the puck, and Subban clearly impedes his ability to do so.

 

 

That being said, maybe not on purpose, but it does appear that your player did tie up the opponent at one point:

 

 

 

I notice you stick lifted, entered a puck pickup and then entered in to the tie up. This would indicate to me that you felt the stick lift was being unresponsive (due to the puck pickup animation taking precedence) and you pressed it in maybe a little longer and this then initiated the tie-up. 

 

It's absolutely the wrong call and you're right to be complaining about this issue.

 

I think this offers some insight in to the penalty system. it's a mystery to me why some calls are made, and some aren't. Clearly there's logic that says ANY tie-up away from the front of the net is considered interference, as evidenced in your clip. But there's also some kind of logic that is taking blatant inference plays and using some type of RNG to determine whether or not the ref decides to call it. 

 

Part of me thinks this is some attempt at simulating referee subjectivity. I feel this should maybe be fine-tuned so that the subjectivity is removed during blatant interference whereas, in the example of shoving someone in front of the net - the subjectivity makes more sense. That said, the subjectivity of the referee calls on the small shoves in front of the net also needs a serious re-working.

 

 

CCP Champion Banner - Blue.png

Message 53 of 69 (564 Views)

Re: Interference calls are horrible

★★★★★ Apprentice

Yep, it’s hilarious…. I go to hit a player with puck, his player without puck cuts Infront of him, I hit hit him instead and I get call for interference. 

Message 54 of 69 (542 Views)

Re: Interference calls are horrible

★★ Pro

Another interference call that makes no sense I have tons of clips of interference calls that make absolutely make no sense 

 

https://www.xbox.com/play/media/D52CKR5F

Message 55 of 69 (524 Views)

Re: Interference calls are horrible

★★ Apprentice

I sometimes intentionally exploit the interference penalties. When racing to the puck and being likely the first to touch the puck, just hit X to raise your stick, and the opponent many times will hit you and get a penalty. It's stupid, but... 🤷‍♀️

Message 56 of 69 (438 Views)

Re: Interference calls are horrible

★★ Pro

This guy was one of those self saucing fools this was my third penalty after he self sauced 

 

https://www.xbox.com/play/media/V7G4YQCV

Message 57 of 69 (417 Views)

Re: Interference calls are horrible

★★ Apprentice
@Treatmentworke66 I feel you, I hate penalties like this. But I kinda think don't hate the player, etc. There's a fine line when it's dumping the puck for real and when it's "pushing the puck forward for myself", hence fine line if it's acceptable to hit or not. In your video, I don't think the penalty is justified.
Message 58 of 69 (401 Views)

Re: Interference calls are horrible

Champion

I'm going to add to the pile-on.  Playing EASHL, in games where we play with an AI he'll take one of these penalties in about two out of every three games.  I don't expect much from an AI teammate, but there's no reason it should be programmed to do this with the way penalties are currently called.

 

The AI will ( actually for once ) engage with the puck carrier and bump him off the puck, but then follow up with a second "hit" after the puck in gone taking a penalty.

 

CCP Champion Banner - Red.png

Message 59 of 69 (376 Views)

Re: Interference calls are horrible

★★ Guide

I thought this was intended to be fixed awhile back ago? In my opinion, I've been thought that the penalties in the game were wayyyy off. I've thought this from the very beginning, honestly

Message 60 of 69 (314 Views)