In responce to the post of the "Terms of Usage".
The "acceptace" of EA's Warranty and EULA are illegal. You are obviously not a legally competent person or attorney. Because the info ans terms of their product is post sale, meaning that you didn't have full legal disclosure. It's basicly just a legal statement to keep people from trying to sue by keeping the reader thinking they can't. But, you still can. You just need to be able to explain how the warranty, Terms, a EULA were not full disclosure and/or an illegal acceptance of them, since once you bought the product you were then given EA's Contract. Then that EA does not then grant legal remedy of your non-acceptance, by giving you a FULL REFUND if you choose to not agree. Leaving you no other option to agree or just be out the money. Making the whole thing illegal as it then is EXTORTION after the fact, and makes the game a SCAM.
The rules of UCC (universal commercial code) aka business law is complex. But, trust me EA knows this.
EA does everything they can to be unethical while trying to look ethical. But, the LAW REQUIRES that there is always REMEDY. EA is just trying to brainwash you into thinking they gave it to you. And, like Maury would say... The lie detector test test proves that was a lie!
I brought this up with Battlefield 4. Which I was unable to play for the first week or so. When I called EA I asked if I could get a full refund. Then said only I BOUGHT IT FROM EA's WEBSITES DIRECTORY. I then explained that I could not take it back to Gamestop and get full price because it was open and the disk was not defective. So EA said they would lose money to offer me a full refund because they didn't get all the money for the purchase, because a portion was earned by Gamestop. Which is EA's fact and not my problem. It's the dost of doing business and the choice of EA to sell thru 2rd party.
They then did want to continue the discussion and began working hard on fixing the issue of why I could get online. Which was fixed in about 30 minutes.
