Re: Why I feel that BfN did not match GW2's success

@Iron_Guard8 Well, come on, I don't like to be boring, but I have to really point out the problems of BFN, really hit detection for me is the worst of them, not that it is a global calamity, because in general punch and bites work 75% of the time, but when they don't work, it's really frustrating, I think economy was a problem, but it's not because we no longer have a rux stocked with tons of items every month and the improvements and skin due to the rotation of passes and the sale for currency they are now very accessible

And about GW1 and GW2 they are even better, I think not, GW2 I technically agree he doesn't have so many problems being very fluid, but GW1 doesn't seem to flow well I feel that he is heavy, in the sense of strange physics map design with bad decisions (plants always have a height advantage), zombies being much stronger, and some repetitive variant problems, But with regard to GW2, which corrected a large part of these problems, it introduced a fun PVE and a more varied gameplay, I agree to say that it is technically much better than BFN and GW1.

Well my assessment for each of the games from 0 to 10 is as follows:

GW1-7

GW2-9,5

BFN-8,5

For personal taste my favorite is the BFN, however I agree that technically GW2 is the best.