If DICE implemented some legacy features would you....

[dirtytamato]

@CantGetRight I will probably never play all out warefare or hazard zone because of the maps and specialists. I don't care about a score board. Portal however is awesome

[Twordy]

Serious balancing issues appear if every class is going to have access to AT rocket. How much fun is in having 10 rockets shot at the same time in 1 chopper? The armor of the tank has to be constantly buffed if everyone might use AT rocket anytime. Having classes in Conquest always made sense. There used to be a strong incentive to have roles in the game. Right now everyone may become a universal non-binary soldier in Conquest and Breakthrough. The other thing is that map design is really nerfed when it comes to the design process. The maps have got so many vertical objects that I can`t really tell from what direction a player might get shot from in the first place, and the terrain is usually flat. There was a reason for classes in older Battlefields but right now someone seems to object to "the legacy" while having complete chaos on 128 maps with its design. Where is the Infantry Conquest again, ahh legacy theme again...  

Why not create a dedicated game mode for Specialists, plain and simple.

I may survive the lack of a classic "brutal" scoreboard and stay by the BR safe space version. But having no ability to create a Squad live in-game is a complete misunderstanding.

I am praying for the community and dedicated servers in the browser so Devs won`t have to fix the problems they created by themselves constantly.

There is so much wrong and right now even Reddit may go under a complete lockdown. That`s right it`s a customer's fault this time.

[-DFA-Thump]

@CantGetRight specialists need to go away or be absorbed into a class system. They would also have to redesign all of the maps (allow the game play oriented devs make the maps and then have the artists step in to make it nice looking not the other way around like they did). They need to get rid of the BS "legacy" doublespeak that they are trying to push.

[RayD_O1]

---

@ElliotLH wrote:

Haven't stopped playing BF2042 yet (just had limited time to play due to life) but I'd be overjoyed if a server browser was added. VOIP would be a nice addition too overall, even if I wouldn't use it much myself.

---

Totally agree, a server browser would go a long way to ease one of my biggest frustrations with BF2042.

Too much time waiting in lobby, too much time playing maps over and over. We need to be able to play through the whole map rotation and not get dumped out to the lobby after every single round, Especially when some rounds may only last a few minutes if you have joined late.

[RayD_O1]

---

@SirBobdk wrote:

---

@CantGetRight wrote:

If DICE implemented some legacy features like scoreboard and VOIP but kept the specialist would you come back to the game?  What would it take for them to put you into this game?

---

1. Joystick support
2. Server Browser
3. Fix portal and more games/maps
4. Specialist customization (Different fractions), no hero crap.
5. Remove voices
6. Add lean/peak
7. Scoreboard

---

If they did that we would have a proper BF title, we can only hope. 

[RayD_O1]

---

@SirBobdk wrote:
@Tank2042Man
I hope a server browser returns for those of us in low population regions so we can still play during off peak hours.
———————————————
Server browser is a must. Matchmaking is just depressing.

---

Amen. 

[RayD_O1]

---

@Kyosji wrote:
@Daeyon-beWhat bugs me is that Server Browser has been the biggest request in every Battlefield game, and the complaints always got to the point they ended up adding it....so why take it out yet again? It's just a repeating cycle.

---

That is actually a very good point and something that has been troubling me, I mean does anyone think MM is a better option than a Server Browser. ?