Battlefield Core Feedback - Maps - Feedback Thread

Maybe, reintroduce buildable cover from BFV..... These maps are not war-torn places like in bf1/bfV... Yet.... so it makes sense there is less cover, but we need to build some maybe? 
 New specialist ability prehaps? 

How about you give both sides bunch of Quadbikes that can be called in?

While I'm hopeful that these map changes can improve gameplay, I feel that a bigger issue is the lesser amount of  content that Battlefield 2042 has. 

I propose that Portal maps be put into an official 64-player playlist with 2042 factions. This would give us players a way to progress towards tier 1 skins while having a refreshed experience with some "new" content.

Edit: Please don't ignore this! You have 6 beautiful maps sitting relatively unused in portal because there's no official way to play them while progressing towards mastery skins. 

All maps apart from 128p Orbital need line of sight blocks. Vehicles are too fast and too silent, also there are way too many vehicles like Boltes and Light helicopters.

Maps are made like they only played vehicles. No destructible buildings and cover. Bf v bad maps feels God-given gift. Middle flag of Map should be a city or base which focuses on infantry play. Look at bf 1, bf 5 and bf 4 maps, All follow this at formula at some extent. Add tow at various places. Add vehicle spawn point where flag is at far place it makes people go to that point. Make movment like bf v, why scrap something which was already good? This applies to most gameplay direction. 

Why not limit Breakthrough to 64 players only or 80 players. Conquest can be kept at 128 player.

128 player on Breakthrough is too much, the map size is fine, objectives can be repositioned in a more linear layout and with the new proposed layouts it may work with 64 player or 80 players.

Why don't you try it with less players than 128 and more players than 64. You could easily set this up for us to try in All out Warfare.

Also some more areas of close combat Metro type area on the maps.

@Straatford87These map changes are welcome
Perhaps these can be included in your considerations
-buildable cover and fortifications from bf5.
-more vehicles in the map or at flags like we had in bf, not boltes or the like but quad bikes, unarmed pickups... Etc
-more clutter and like containers, signs, other objects for cover
-map sizes actually designed for 128 players rather than just having HUGE maps for the sake of huge size maps

-please don't reduce vehicles or nerf them to oblivion, but rather give us infantry maps or maps designed for both inf and vehicles (eg bf5 devastation where c flag in Church was inf D flag was inf and tanks had access to A flag and E flag areas)

Nerfing vehicles to oblivion will not satisfy inf players or vehicle players we need to find tje balance