No mention of a Server Browser in Update 4.0

[Sc0tch_Whiskey]

They better change it with this next patch of updates. Imagine playing a game you paid your money for when they want you and not when you want to. Imagine over 400 fixes and changes but cannot play lol. 

[SirBobdk]

And no joystick support. 
A BF game without a server browser and joystick support is just a deal breaker and always will be for me.

[Tommyfare]

With this state of the game and that less players they won't implement a server browser. 

If there was a server browser you were able to see the real player numbers and servers and EA/DICE don't want that. 

That's why they don't give sales numbers out too

[RayD_O1]

@ElliotLH
Here's hoping indeed mate, I would definitely be awarding very BIG brownie points the day they implement it.

[RayD_O1]

---

@Sc0tch_Whiskey wrote:

They better change it with this next patch of updates. Imagine playing a game you paid your money for when they want you and not when you want to. Imagine over 400 fixes and changes but cannot play lol. 

---

Yeah and you are one of the unlucky ones who has not been able to get into matches most of the time.

As you rightly say 400 fixes means nothing if you can't play. !

[RayD_O1]

---

@SirBobdk wrote:

And no joystick support. 
A BF game without a server browser and joystick support is just a deal breaker and always will be for me.

---

Totally understand and agree wholeheartedly, two key elements that should definitely have been in BF2042 right from day one. 

Would you ever have dreamt we would be having this conversation about a 5 month old BF title.

[RayD_O1]

---

@Tommyfare wrote:

With this state of the game and that less players they won't implement a server browser. 

If there was a server browser you were able to see the real player numbers and servers and EA/DICE don't want that. 

That's why they don't give sales numbers out too

---

Yep and the ironic thing is if they had implemented a server browser / persistent servers right from the start they wouldn't have lost so many players imho.

[ABC-Warrior-real]

This, and the lack of Squad controls, are the primary reason my group of friends are still playing BF5.  There can be up to 6 of us, and it's simply not possible to get us all in the same game, let alone over a series of rounds.  Why someone thought this change was progress is beyond me.

Simple solution, increase the size of the game party to 8, so you can have 2 squads of friends playing.  Squad controls are important too though; making them private, inviting friends into them, etc, this is not legacy stuff, this is essential

[Adamonic]

@RayD_O1 What is crazy is the player count would stop bleeding if they went to a Server Browser option in AOW.

If you want one way to bring some players back without having to worry about game physics, weapons and vehicle balancing, or bug fixes, this is it.

[RayD_O1]

---

@Adamonic wrote:
@RayD_O1What is crazy is the player count would stop bleeding if they went to a Server Browser option in AOW.

If you want one way to bring some players back without having to worry about game physics, weapons and vehicle balancing, or bug fixes, this is it.
 

---

100% agree with you, it's a real no brainer isn't it.

I honestly can't believe DICE expected anyone to accept MM instead of the server browser / persistent servers we are all used to.